2009
Thu
23
Jul

# Of Approximation And That Granny On A Trishaw

(8)
Tuition given in the topic of E-Maths Tuition Notes & Tips from the tuition centre desk of at 9:25 pm (Singapore time)
You DO get this, right?

As if the world hasn’t had enough of the geek calendar, today (being 22 July) (Edit: Actually it was yesterday – couldn’t post this in time 🙁 ) happens to be Pi Approximation Day – a day to honour that often-used fraction to approximate the value of π, though in reality etc. are actually better approximations.

Speaking of approximation, Miss Loi would like to pay a little homage on this day to this most primal and basic of mathematical topics. A topic that many of us first may have first grasped from the Granny of that classic folk song:

『三轮车，跑得快，上面坐個老太太。

Translation: Granny was so impressed with her fast & furious trishaw that she rounded off her $0.50 fare to the nearest dollar. A topic that resurfaced later in life when a mean taxi uncle (who knew you haven’t been taught approximation in school yet) asked for$10 when the meter showed $9.70. Or when you somehow instinctively brought along$50 to a sale to grab five items at $9.90 each, for nothing would be left if you had to return home to get more money. Or that Miss Loi’s weight will always be 50 kg (correct to the nearest 10 kg) everytime you asked her … In any case, do take a moment today to reflect on the following rules which are, well, supposedly so simple it’s laughable for anyone old enough not to be cheated by mean taxi uncles. ### Rounding Off A Number 1. Take the digit to the right of the specified (decimal) place/significant figure. 2. If digit < 5, drop this digit/replace with zeros to keep place value. If digit ≥ 5, add 1 to digit on the left before dropping/replace with zeros to keep place value. 要五毛，給一塊, and the 三輪車 Granny is always right! 3. ALWAYS use/show at least 1 more decimal place/sig. fig. in your intermediate workings and only round off to the required decimal places/sig. fig. in your final answer. CASE-IN-POINT: See Miss Loi’s O-Level ‘significant’ careless mistake ### Rules of Significant Figures 1. All non-zero digits (i.e. 1-9) and zeros in between them are significant. e.g. 12 (2 sig. fig.), 12.5 (3 sig. fig.), 1.025 (4 sig. fig.) 2. Zeros ARE significant UNLESS 1. they are at the beginning of a decimal less than 1 e.g. 0.007 (1 sig. fig.), 0.071 (2 sig. fig.), 1.007 (4 sig. fig.) 2. *they are at the end of a whole number e.g. *87 000 (2, 3, 4 or 5 sig. fig.), 8.7000 (5 sig. fig.) *Depends on how estimation is made e.g. 86 999.587 000 (correct to 5 sig. fig.) 86 99587 000 (correct to 4 sig. fig.) 86 990 ≈ 87 000 (correct to 3 sig. fig.) 86 900 ≈ 87 000 (correct to 2 sig. fig.) 86 000 ≈ 90 000 (correct to 1 sig. fig.) Note how we round off the digit to the right of the required no. of significant figures. Ultimately, however, do be aware that this seemingly-innocuous topic actually harvests itself in more than half of the questions in any O-Level exam that require numerical answers, as pre-warned on the cover page of every paper (which some of you never ever read 😕 ): Give non-exact numerical answers correct to 3 significant figures, or 1 decimal place in the case of angles in degrees, unless a different level of accuracy is specified in the question. Or unless you want to self-PWN. • In addition, what has not (but should have) been stated in the instruction is that when it comes to money, the final answer should be in 2 decimal places (i.e. to the nearest cent) – a leading cause of grief in many exams 🙁 • Also do note the following additional note in your syllabus document: “Unless stated otherwise within a question, three-figure accuracy will be required for answers. This means that four-figure accuracy should be shown throughout the working, including cases where answers are used in subsequent parts of the question. Premature approximation will be penalised, where appropriate. Angles in degrees should be given to one decimal place.” And in this era of foreign cyborgs and “90% to get A1!” moderation, failure to adhere to the above Commandment has often led to minor loss of marks here and there that could sadly mean the difference between grades, euphoria and despair. Be careful when using the value of an answer from an earlier part. Even Miss Loi fell prey to this ‘significant’ careless mistake in the 2008 O-Level EMaths Paper 2 *sigh* But having said this, Miss Loi and some of her students have always wondered what exactly is a “non-exact numerical” answer? What if an answer showed exactly 1.2345678 in your calculator – should you leave as such or round it off to 1.23 (3 sig. fig.)? Hmmm … 你说奇怪不奇怪? 頑張って!!! ### Revision Exercise To show that you have understood what Miss Loi just taught you from the centre, you must: Comments & Reactions ### 7 Comments 1. plankton commented in tuition class 2009 Jul 23 Thu 9:51pm 1 In such unanticipated situation, one should rebel, flaunt the rules, and shock the teacher by penning a heart-felt poem instead! Roses are red, violets are blue. I have a dog, but it looks like a cat. It's very confusing, very much like maths. Heh :p 2. Miss Loi Friend Miss Loi on Facebook @MissLoi commented in tuition class 2009 Jul 24 Fri 12:35pm 2 If your dog looks like a cat You may need to change your specs :p And if maths is hard to understand Maybe a sexy maths tutor can lend a hand 😀 3. happious commented in tuition class 2010 Mar 8 Mon 11:55pm 3 what is the marking scheme for paper 1 and 2? are marks awarded for workings in paper 1? 4. Miss Loi Friend Miss Loi on Facebook @MissLoi commented in tuition class 2010 Oct 10 Sun 10:41pm 4 A couple of question was asked here but Miss Loi finds it more appropriate to reply here, since they deal with the topic of this blog post: "... is it true that candidates should leave final answers (other than in degrees) to 3 significant figures ONLY if the answer is not exact. E.g. 74.5 / 4, do we leave our final answer as 18.625 since it is exact?" This has been a longstanding debate amongst anxious students, teachers and schools every year but the straightforward answer is yes - all exact answers should be left as they are i.e. in the exact number of decimal places. The not-so-straightforward scenario would be what if your "exact" answer happens to be exactly 1.2345678, as mentioned at the end of this blog post? A certain school even once ascertained that "the answer is deemed to be exact if it doesn't fill up the whole of the calculator's screen". But calculators are created different with different number of digits! Granted these are freak cases, perhaps it's best to leave the final answer with its full compliment of decimal places or in fraction form, with the remark 'exact' next to it just to convince the examiner that you know what you're doing, should you encounter something like this. Anyone disagree? " ... use at least 4 significant figures to do working, and if the working includes figures that have been rounded off to 4sf, the final answer should be corrected to 3sf even if it appears as a fraction which is exact?" Yes, the accuracy of your final answer would have been affected by rounding off the intermediate values in your working. So as a result, your final answer is non-exact. " ... answers in money should be rounded off to the nearest cent and not 3 significant figures e.g.$245.67 and not $246 (3sf)?" This should be as clear as day by now: Unless stated otherwise, money should be rounded off to the nearest cent e.g.$100.00

Don't short-change yourself!

• Aaron replied to Miss Loi’s comment

2010
Oct
12
Tue
3:22pm

4.1

@Miss Loi: Thanks for the help!

Quote:
" ... answers in money should be rounded off to the nearest cent and not 3 significant figures e.g. $245.67 and not$246 (3sf)?"

This should be as clear as day by now: Unless stated otherwise, money should be rounded off to the nearest cent e.g. $100.00 -- I refer to the O level 2008 Additional Mathematics Suggested Solutions http://www.exampaper.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/gce-o-level-2008-amaths-4038-paper-2-solutions.pdf For question 1 (ii), you rounded off your "Value after 18 months" to 3 significant figures. Should the answer be$2529.80 (corrected to nearest cent)?

Could the answer be because when in cents, it depends on the accuracy of the 'p' value which is approximated? Which means that since the 'p' value was already rounded to a number of significant figures (preferred by the candidate but not less than 4), it is not smart to round it to the nearest cent as it means 6 significant figures when the value of 'p' was already rounded off to 5 sf?

• 2010
Oct
15
Fri
12:00pm

@Aaron: Your question seems to have ignited one of the controversies of the century as far as O level AMaths go 😛

To be absolutely honest, when Miss Loi made her "clear as day: to the nearest cent" remark she was referring to answers in the Money & Personal Finance topic under the Arithmetic chapter in EMaths, where students are specifically tested on the transactions and values of money, and hence non-exact answers should be left to the nearest cent.

The 2008 AMaths Paper 2 Q1, however, is actually a question on Logarithmic and Exponential functions and hence Miss Loi did the calculations and left the answer, in her usual way for such questions, in 3 sig. fig.

Yes it's an assumption and so in a quest to get a better consensus, she decided to 飞鸽传书 (via her students) this query to some teachers and at the same check some of the standard TYS solutions. And the result is ...

• ShingLee TYS says to the nearest cent (2 d.p.)
• Dyna TYS says 3 sig. fig.
• 5 out of 6 teachers say it's to the nearest cent (since it's money)
• However, the last teacher was reported to have pulled out the Imperial Edict aka 圣旨 aka Cambridge Marker's Report following which the whole class knelt down to see that the final answer was left in 3 sig. fig.!

As such, Miss Loi thinks she'll leave that particular answer in 3 sig. fig. for now. Did you ask your cher's opinion on this?

5. TJK commented in tuition class

2010
Oct
15
Fri
9:27pm

5

Actually for 1.2345678 (exact)

I feel i have a safer way (I did it for more than once for exams)

1.2345678 (exact) which is approx. to 1.23 (3 s.f.)

### One Reaction

1. Miss Loi tweeted

2009
Jul
23
Thu
1:30pm

6

How many significant figures does 87000 contain? http://bit.ly/NPwLu

• ### Careers @Miss Loi’s Temple

*applicable only to Singaporeans & Singapore PRs with a 100% 百分百 uncompromised familiarity with Singapore's MOE syllabi.